would gain control of the most powerful nation in the world;
would delude their minds into thinking that they had come from man's
effort, instead of God's blessings;
would promote an attitude of loving things and using people, instead
of the other way around;
would dupe entire states into relying on gambling for their state
I would convince people that character is not an issue when it comes
would make it legal to take the life of unborn babies;
would make it socially acceptable to take one's own life, and invent
machines to make it convenient;
would cheapen human life as much as possible so that life of animals
are valued more than human beings;
would take God out of the schools, where even the mention of His name
was grounds for a lawsuit;
would come up with drugs that sedate the mind and target the young,
and I would get sports heroes to advertise them;
would get control of the media, so that every night I could pollute
the minds of every family member for my agenda;
would attack then family, the backbone of any nation. I would make
divorce acceptable and easy, even fashionable. If the family crumbles,
so does the nation;
would compel people to express their most depraved fantasies on canvas
and movies screens, and I would call it art;
would convince the world that people are born homosexuals, and that
their lifestyles should be accepted and marveled; **
would convince the people that right and wrong are determined by a
few who call themselves authorities and refer to their agendas as
would persuade people that the church is irrelevant and out of date,
the Bible is for the naive:
would dull the minds of Christians, and make them believe that prayer
is not important, and that faithfulness and obedience are optional;
I were the devil] I
GUESS I WOULD LEAVE THINGS PRETTY MUCH THE WAY THEY ARE!"
the following comment on its Web site at http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/p/paulharveycommentary.htm
, "According to WorldNetDaily, this was written by Paul Harvey
and copyrighted by WorldNetDaily in 1999."
** Note from Webmaster concerning
a statement by Mr. Harvey:
Having been attacked by a advocating
young-adult homosexual when I was a teenager, I can understand Mr.
Harvey's concern in his comment, probably referring to the extra ordinary
attacks on the Boy Scouts by the bully secularist membership of the
ACLU, which Bill O'Reilly of Fox News calls Fascist, referring to
the dictionary by definition, O'Reilly's viewership is over two million
a night around the world.
It is true that any young, healthy
straight man, who is introduced into the homosexual lifestyles through
forced sex, can become homosexual through the destruction of their
self-esteem after their being violated, not born into the lifestyle
by choice. Many homosexuals center their lives upon their heavy sex
drives, males for instance calling the scrotum that holds the male
testicles as "the basket."
And Harvey's comment about some
in society marveling at the homosexual lifestyle, is also true. For
example, when two deaf lesbian women recently used DNA science to
make a test-tube baby so it would be born 100% deaf like them, (purposely
creating a deformed individual in their words, for their pleasure),
the elitists of the press and the secular membership of the ACLU said
nothing about this baby being denied its civil rights to be born normal.
Instead the baby was treated like a test-tube frog born with an extra
leg coming off its head, these organizations through their silence
seeming to marvel at the abuse.
I'm not against the homosexual
community, having lived around their lifestyle in southeast Florida
and worked with them in Hollywood, California. But they really
do need to bear the responsibility for allowing advocates to run
their show, causing a lot of anger and mistrust of their lifestyle
from others, which is going to be very hard to turnaround.
For instance, I don't remember
the homosexual community attacking their organization GLAAD when it
was involved in stopping the reporting in the media of the death of
thirteen-year old Jesse Dirkhising in 1999 in Rogers, Arkansas, the
press across the country virtually refusing to print the story of
this boy's horrific death at the hands of two older men. These
adults then defecated on the boy's dead body after they had murdered
him. Yet this same media that avoided Jesse's story had a shark feeding
at the abduction of Elizabeth Smart.
People can smell the stink of America's
corrupted press, whether it's the New York Times allowing reporters
to create stories as if they were the truth, the L.A. Times doctoring
a photo to made our troops in Iraq look like they were going to shoot
homeless civilians, or CBS News trying to take down the President
of the United States with documents they were told were forged, yet
ignored the warnings. As one news analysis said, "CBS
saw it as too good to check."
Cathy Renna, responsible in 1999
for the PR releases by GLAAD, said only a few months after Jesse's
death that GLAAD had over 1,500 advocating reporters in the press rooms of
America, and therefore journalists no longer needed to get the other
side of the story. This created a major crack in the foundation
of the trust the public had for its press, unbelievably caused not
by the people, but by a few like Ms. Renna who are elite members of
private organizations like GLAAD and the ACLU, hijacking the media
and steering it with the arrogance of the captain of the Titanic.
The press, as proven again by the
recent debacle at CBS News, cannot be trusted as it continues to abuse
the privilege that was provided it by the establishment of the Fourth
Estate, formed by our forefathers to protect this democracy by reporting
the news without coloring it. The concept was based on the principle
that with a free press the people then could make their own decisions.
But too many elite editors want
to shape and color the news that people read to create the outcomes
they want. Why else would the press need the relatively new central
clearing house, the American Society of Newspaper Editors (ASNE),
formed recent in the 1970s to help it color the news before people
are allowed to read it?
No longer do newspapers reflect
the wonderful individuality of American communities. They instead
now try to infect these very same communities with their sick politically-correct
concepts and agenda that wants to secularize America while continuing
to reduce responsibility of the American family in raising its young.
For instance, have you recently
read in your newspaper that the ACLU was supporting NAMBLA pro bono
in a lawsuit that has now gone on now for years, the mother of a dead
ten-year old boy who had been killed by a member of NAMBLA, the man
saying he got the idea from NAMBLA's Web site. The mother only wanted
to taken down the offensive Web site so other boys could not be murdered.
The ACLU, instead, has called the information on NAMBLA's Web site
freedom of speech.
Your having to read this news event
here is a sad commentary on the lies you are already fed by the press,
along with stories that are kept from you to protect these private
organizations that control the media with an iron fist.