ENTER THE ACLU
It was reported a
doctor said a fetus feels pain beginning at 20 weeks of gestation,
yet the ACLU tried hard to suppress while
representing the National Abortion Federation recently
in court of law on March 23, 2004. |
Should we be surprised that an organization
that says it prides itself on fighting for civil rights suddenly wants
to ban from a court of law information that will influence opinion.
We just need to be aware that there are many new age agendas coming
from the halls of the ACLU.
The
ACLU is one and the same that recently filed a brief in a Kansas City
case in the fall of 2003 where an 18-year
old adult was caught having continued sex with a 14-year old disabled
child in a group home environment, even after having been told twice
to stop. The third time put him in jail.
The ACLU's brief in this
case shouted that the membership of the ACLU now supports the belief
that thirteen-year old children should be able to give consent to
sex with anyone.
It concluded that if the ACLU's belief had been in
effect while this man was having sex with this child, he would
have been set free. "Set free? But why?"
The link in the above paragraph provides the following statement from
the Kansas attorney general:
"Kansas Attorney
General Phill Kline told reporters, 'The ACLU (American Civil Liberties
Union) states specifically in its brief that it is a constitutional
right for any child age 13 and older to consent to have sex with
anyone.' "
With this brief, the ACLU's membership
is now effectively saying it openly promotes an agenda that agrees
with the North American Man / Boy Love Association (NAMBLA*),
an organization whose goal is to make it legal for their membership
to have oral sex and sodomy with young males.
ENTER
A BIASED MEDIA - SHELTERING ADULT-CHILD SEX IDEOLOGIES:
America's mainstream media at times
has followed sting operations of U.S. businessmen who have traveled
abroad and arranged to have sex with young children in Asian countries.
Yet suddenly this same media is silent when the ACLU proposes opening
the flood gates for adult sex with America's children. Why?
While it looks like political correctness
gone mad, be assured it is not. This is only more proof that Americans
are being seduced and lied to by the newspaper and television network
editors who would not cover this story. They promote instead their
selected ideologies as they sit in judgment on the information that
is disseminated to the public.
Many mainstream media outlets have
become the wolves among us, rather than the white knights of truth.
And by accepting this brief without challenging it in their newspapers
and on their television screens, they have made it past the hen house
and into your home. They are seducing the American public into accepting
the selected vision they have for this country as dictated by the
membership of organizations they align themselves with . . . such
as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), GLAAD, the North American Man
/ Boy Love Association (NAMBLA), and the American Society of
Newspaper Editors (ASNE) through their daily coloring of the
news the public reads.
Our forefathers could have never conceived
that the Fourth Estate would be used as a weapon of mass destruction.
Their answer for keeping a democracy strong was to use the concept
of a free press as the freedom to report, not the freedom to distort.
Never have so few lied to so many.
THE ATTACK
ON THE BOY SCOUTS BY THE FEW. THE ELITE. THE ACLU:
Now enter the ACLU's active fight
against the Boy Scouts of America to force the national organization
to accept sexually active advocating homosexuals into the scouts as the ACLU's
agenda with NAMBLA becomes even more clear. The ACLU's whining about
the scouts being an organization that discriminates is just a mask
to hide the ACLU's greater agenda for children, as written in their
Kansas City brief.
The real
agenda of the ACLU is to use this hammer to finally break down the American family and the traditions that made America unique.
And history is on their side. Remember Hitler's successful attempt
to destroy an ideology by replacing it with another through the entire
society? Read next how he did it.
THE ATTACK
ON FAMILY VALUES BY SECULARISTS:
If you saw the recent series on the
History Channel about the effects of the German Youth Movement in
the 1930s on German society, you would have discovered through interviews
of Germans still living from those times along with Hitler's film
archive that the destruction of the family was Hitler's first agenda in removing the everyday citizen's resistance to his Third Reich.
He did his by convincing children to turn against their parents while
beating up other youngsters who would not follow the banner of Hitler's
Youth Movement, and the family units came tumbling down in the millions.
To this end, the membership of the
ACLU is now using the mask of civil rights to change laws that will
lower the age of children to consent to sex with adults in its
vision of a Secular society.
This act would pit children directly
against their parents, just as Hitler did to German families before
World War II. The ACLU has become so arrogant in
its Secular agenda that it has decided to show its hand early, probably
believing Americans are no longer supporting the traditional family
values that had once been taught to them by their grandparents.
It
was these patriarchs who made America the strongest country in the
world through their support of the right to instill in their young
children their personal and individual family values based on their
origin, traditions, and beliefs. We have recently seen through the
eyes of the French what happens when Secularism roots its politically-correct
tentacles into a society's social fabric; nothing else is tolerated
or allowed to flourish in the Secular garden. Secularism becomes its
own religion.
If the ACLU and its network of supporting
newspapers such as the Boston Globe, L.A. Times, and New York Times,
to name only a few, are successful in bringing Secularism to America,
it will be this country's first state religion.
NAMBLA AND THE ACLU - LEGALIZING
SEX WITH MALE CHILDREN AS "LOVE?"
So when many were surprised last year
as the ACLU pro-bono and sudden
support of NAMBLA against a law suit to
take its Web site down, which was informing its members how to seduce
young children while avoiding being arrested, the ACLU's claim that
it was an issue of free speech can now be viewed as bogus.
To refresh your memory, in 1997 a
NAMBLA member killed a ten-year old boy, Jeffrey Curley, by forcing
the boy to breath gasoline fumes from a rag while he held the boy
down in the backseat of a car after kidnapping the child.
The boy's
parents later brought a law suit against NAMBLA that if won would
force the organization to take down its Web site, the parents hoping
it would prevent other boys from being murdered by other NAMBLA members.
But these parents probably never dreamed
the ACLU's membership would come to NAMBLA's defense and aid against
them and their dead child. The suit alleges that NAMBLA's Web site
was continuing to provide materials on how its members could avoid
the authorities while having sex with young boys . . . the kind of
downloaded materials reported to have been found in the apartment
of one of Jeffrey Curley's kidnapper and murderers.
LET'S ASK SOME QUESTIONS:
People have a right to know why card-carrying
members of the ACLU, which includes college professors along with
Hollywood elite, support the organization's push to legalize sex with
thirteen-year old children.
The ACLU is an organization that seems
to have about only 300,000 paying members in the United States and
abroad. Yet many members can be very influential and elite individuals
in America's entertainment industry, political environment, educational
institutions, and the halls of government.
We all need to ask why these elite
and nameless individuals want our thirteen-year old children to be
able to give permission for sex with whomever they want.
THE DAY THE NEWSPAPER PRESSES STOOD STILL!
The ACLU, GLAAD, and NAMBLA would
have had a vested interest in stopping the presses on another story
of the horrendous death of another child, the thirteen-year-old Jesse
Dirkhising, murdered by two men in September of 1999, one being
22-years old and the other 49.
And that is exactly what they did
in the early fall of that year when the newspaper presses across the
United States stood still in regard to the death of Jesse Dirkhising.
The newspapers had finally shown their ugly face in unison. . . that
national editorial positions held within the national press were refusing
in rank to print Jesse's story under the public's right to know. The
three major television networks followed in suit.
This proved once and for all that
the editorial suites within the elite media were owned outright by
the memberships of GLAAD, NAMBLA, and the ACLU. Your right to know
was trashed the day the press stood still.
GLAAD's proclamation in 1999 that
it now owned the high-ground with the press has come true.
Americans could have never known the
evil that was going on to suppress their right to know, as Jesse's
story never made it past the senior editor's desk of newspaper after
newspaper nor onto the presses.
The story therefore never made it
to most of the American public. The same had happened for the networks,
anchors refusing to report on Jesse's horrible death in front of their
network studio cameras.
Our free press no longer reports the
news until it had been first filtered, colored, and then smeared with
its personal ideologies. Only then does it make it to your front door.
In fact, when was the last time you
read or saw an investigative report by a newspaper editor or a on-air
network television investigative reporter on the agendas of those
who were the members of GLAAD, NAMBLA, and the ACLU?
And why hasn't the media challenged
these same groups about funds received from overseas organizations
that would have a vested interest in America changing into a Secular
society? Why aren't these obvious hot-button issues that concern your
family and its welfare being covered by the media to protect you?
Isn't that their job?
The last story I can remember questioned
the membership of the ACLU. It was printed in a Washington, D.C. Newspaper.
The story was read by accident while I was waiting for a connecting plane
to land at the then Washington National Airport.
The year was 1982.
GLAAD, NAMBLA, and the ACLU membership is very elite, wealthy, and influential.
WHAT ONE PERSON CAN DO:
For one thing, we can become more
active and challenge what we read and what we don't see being reported.
The newspaper and television station should be doing updates on stories
like those of the murder of Jeffrey Curley along with interviews with
Jeffrey's mother if they are really watching out for your interests.
If not, ask why.
The media should also explain why
it didn't make GLAAD accountable when the organization made a "no
comment" on the murder of Jesse Dirkhising, the media instead
suppressing the boy's death from
the general public.
While
the media was glad to hold the feet of Catholic Bishops to the fire
over the child abuse scandal of homosexual acts by their priests,
why did they allow GLAAD to hop, skip, and slip away without a mark
or scratch? Ask them the question.
You may be surprised at the answer. They don't care.
And reports have come out on cable
news channels that homosexual materials have been available and are
now read in some church seminaries. Why? Who is allowing the information
to be brought into these seminaries, which has caused so many problems
over the decades for the Catholic Church? Why isn't it being stopped?
Why aren't these church leaders being removed to start real change?
You can also challenge advertisers
asking why their products sponsor agendas that offend foundational
family values.
Here is an real-life example of what
can happen when corporation discover their image is being tarnished
by the media without their knowledge, as reported on the O'Reilly
Factor on the FOX News Channel.
A father was training his son to
drive the family car. The son said, "Driver gets to select
the radio station, right Dad? "The father agreed and the two went
on down the road.
The next day the father drove to work in the same
car, the radio station still set to the same station. Suddenly there
was Bubba the Love Sponge giving out pornographic URLs on
the radio and telling listeners if they were even under 18-years
old they could go see how to set up their own similar sites. (I
knew of a teenager who did exactly that last year, running his own
porn site.)
The father was outraged and thought, "Not to my kid, you don't!" The father then wrote to ALL the
corporate sponsors of the show, providing them with what Bubba was
saying on the radio to teenagers. Letters started coming back, corporations
saying they didn't know . . . their advertising was being handled
by advertising agencies.
Suddenly Bubba started to loose
corporate sponsors. And then the FCC found out about the story.
Soon Bubba was fined and Clear Channel Radio fired him. And it all
started with a father training his child how to drive.
CABLE NEWS
CHANNELS - FAIR & BALANCED:
You can see from the above story that
cable news is one of the last bastions of the free press that can
be trusted for reporting all the news.
Since the agendas of the network news
organizations and many local newspapers have now become apparent,
be suspicious of the reporting of these sources and challenge them.
If a local newspaper will not publish your letter-to-the-editor when
it follows their guidelines, cut the cord and stop giving them your
subscription. Without money, they die.
That weakens the agenda of
the press and their usefulness to the organizations that are controlling
them. Cable news channels are available
through your local cable and satellite providers. If you don't have
one, get on! Don't give blank trust to your local newspaper anymore
or your local television stations. They may not report on certain
subjects unless you demand it.
Never trust just one cable
news source. Tune in to all of them to hear all the opinions of their
many guests. It is the only way one can be educated and stop the attempted
take over of your values by elite organizations centered in Washington,
D.C.
CNN is too
much like an international news organization aligned with the attitudes
of Europe more than those of America. During Saddam's rule of Iraq, it was
reported CNN had finally admitted that during its many years in Iraq,
its bureau in Baghdad had purposely not reported to the American people
many of the atrocities that were happening in that country.
Their
reasoning was that Saddam would have not allowed them to continue
to stay in the country. That is the kind of blatant abuse to the Fourth
Estate you need to make yourself aware of. Of course, remember the
principle of the Fourth Estate is an American concept.
Finally, consider contacting your
local Congressmen or Senator when you see change in the social environment
through another unsuspecting source . . . that of new-age activist
judges that want force their own political agenda on your family's values,
creating law rather than evaluating current law.
By the way, need proof that FOX News is giving you all the news and not just their agenda, the rest of the media telling you FOX is the media outlet for only the far right.
Well they lie. When Jesse's murderers went on trial for his torture and horrible murder, you would think the media would want to cover the details of his heinous killing.
But only one cable / network television outlet sent a crew to cover the story. Just one, and according to the local police it was only FOX News that cared about justice for Jesse. They wouldn't suppress the story, and why you can trust FOX News for ALL the news, not the other media's censored news outlets.
THE BOTTOM LINE - AMERICA'S
GRANDPARENTS BUILT THIS COUNTRY:
The Interstates you've driven on .
. . the bridges you've crossed . . . many of the building you've walk
into . . . the electricity you've used . . . the water systems you've
taken a shower with . . . the damns you've seen or driven over. .
. the airline terminals you've entered . . . the trains you've see
going down the track with America's freight inside. . . the 18-wheelers
you've seen that carry America's goods from town to town . . . the
cars you've driven . . . the telephone system you've used to make
calls . . . the radio stations you've listened to . . . the television
shows you've watched . . . the movies you've attended . . . the pictures
you've taken of your family . . . the home appliances you've used
. . . the homes you've lived in . . . the restaurants you've eaten
in . . . the foundation of the space program that exists today. .
.and the morals that made this country unique in the world . . . were
all created by our grandparents.
We are using the stuff they
created. All we have done is to add to some of it.Yet in just forty years of selfishness
and too much wealth, America is now beginning to rapidly roll down
the path that Plato warned us of . . . that successful democracies
can never survive.
Plato implied that with successful democracies strange
ideas of freedom enter into the literature, the arts, and then into
the government, with the day eventually coming when even puppy
dogs would stand up on their hind legs and demand their freedoms.
Sound like today? It is. Plato went on to say shockingly and
if you want to know the future, that the people would become so disappointed
with their new society they would do anything to bring it back to
the way it was even at the expense of their freedom.
That is what happened in Germany in
1937 when the German people voted their democracy dead by 96% of the
vote, people hoping they could return the country to its previous
traditions and values.
Of course, that is never possible when a democracy
has been archived to history per Plato's predictions of 2,000 years
ago. Instead their country was destroyed in 1945 by the rest of the
world.
Take this lesson to heart. Look at
where our country is at today. If you wondered what happen to the
Greeks and the Romans, stop. You already know the answer. Democracies
can never survive. Look at America today for the signs
of strange things entering into the society that Plato warned of.
The
nation has been quickly overrun by immigrants, not unlike the Muslims
overtaking France, because too many young citizens no longer want to do dirty jobs.
95% of all high school students
are reported to go onto a university. Yet they're so consumed with
their own pleasures, the CDC reported in 2004 that STDs were now
beyond epidemic levels, the health organization reporting that HALF
of today's teens will have contacted an STD before reaching the
age 25.
With come STDs incurable, a teen or young adult's future
will be held in the hands of their future infected lover. Will they
be told of the infection, or will be simply be passed on?
In twenty
years, as the infected of this group reaches 40-years old as their
disease begins to ravage their bodies, they will most likely overwhelm
the American health system.
The CDC reported the costs for treating
the already infected has already had a profound effect on our country's
medical superstructure.- University professors want to
be employed by campuses that are protected by America's military.
Yet too many stick their finger up in the air to ROTC classes on
their campus . . . that they are too good to have military people
on their campus. They believe the less fortunate should be grateful
they can serve in the Armed Forces and be paid.
The voters of the
city of San Francisco in 2005 voted to ban recruiters from talking
with high school students about a career in the military. One city
official even asked, "Why does America even need a military?"
The ACLU now wants children of
thirteen- or fourteen-years of age to be able to determine who they
will have sex with, over riding their parent's will.
A Kansas City
prosecutor said the ACLU if getting its way would probably then
give its 800-number to all American teenagers in care parents
restrict their civil rights.
Canada recently has allowed consent
laws for teenagers to be dropped to 14-years old, setting up a possible
scenario:"Ding dong" . . . "Honey, your professor
is here to take you out. She wants to know if you have the condom."
Peter Singer, a popular professor
at Princeton University in liberal New Jersey and a member of Princeton's
Center for Human Values (whatever that means), believes humans should
be able to have sex with non-humans (animals.) How he has gone one
step further, telling a reporter in 2004 that if parents want to
conceive a child simply to use its organs for an existing ill sibling,
that would be morally acceptable to him.
America can no longer be seriously
referred to as the city on the hill. Ironically, it was reported that
an estimated 80% of the troops that provide protection for America
through its military are Christians.
Something is wrong when a army
made up of 80% Christians is assigned to protect a country that is
being driven toward a Pagan society with every passing day, the so-called
Fourth Estate that was supposed to protect our democracy helping to
lead the charge under the ACLU's new banner of the separation of church
and state.
If you allow others to tell you how
to live and do nothing about it, you deserve the government you get.
In addition you're going to loose the family's values that were passed
onto you by your grandparents.
That's important because they in their
prime were the lighthouse for America's ultimate success in becoming
the strongest and most profitable country in human history.
It's because of their real diversity
while advocating responsible freedom, and not through today's faux
diversity of exclusion, that this country flourished up until the
1960s.
It was then that everything started to change from "we"
nation to a "me" nation, flower children believing there
was an easier way. But there never is when running and protecting a society.
1950's family icons were strong and
determined, knowing who they were and what they believed in and never
easily swayed like too many Americans are today. These pioneers understood
struggle and were extremely street smart, many coming to this country
as immigrants who were invited with only the shirt on their backs.
To not continue to support their values is like kicking them in the
face with designer shoes.
We all need to stand up and fight
for the principles taught to us by our past generations. It is the
only safe harbor we have to plant our family values, our traditions,
and those heritages that were handed down to us by our family roots.
* NAMBLA is an organization
that GLAAD's membership has not distanced itself from. |