How the Elite Media Judges a Story

Circa 2004


"Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq." - Bad!


"Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia." - Good!

"Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq." - Bad!

"Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia." - Good!

"Bush imposes regime change in Iraq." - Bad!

"Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia." - Good!

"Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator" - Bad!

"Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists." - Good!

"Bush invades Iraq with UN approval and overwhelming congressional support." - Bad!

"Clinton invades Haiti and attacks Serbia without UN approval, congressional support or public backing." - Good!

"Bush bombs terrorist camps." - Bad!

"Clinton bombs Chinese embassy, some empty mud huts in Afghanistan, and a pharmaceutical plant in Sudan." - Good!

"Bush lands on aircraft carrier in jumpsuit." - Bad!

"Clinton commits many felonies while in office." - Good!

"Bush says there are WMD in Iraq." - Bad!

"Clinton says there are many mass graves in Serbia." - Good!

"No WMD found Iraq." - Bad!

"No mass graves found in Serbia." - Good!

"World Trade Centers falls under Bush." - Bad!

"Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden." - Good!

"Bush says Saddam has nukes." - Bad!

"Clinton says Saddam has nukes." - Good!

"Bush imposes regime change in Iraq." - Bad!

"Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq." - Good!

"Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan." - Bad!

"Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton." - Good!

"Saddam in custody." - Bad

"Serbs who committed atrocities still free." - Good!


Source: E-mail


"Freedom is Knowledge"